[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-2008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63310#action_63310
]
Kari J. Niemi commented on SM-2008:
-----------------------------------
OK, I tried...it was somewhat difficult to get the snapshot version to my
reactor...as I had no uptodate/snapshot maven&apache repositories available.
I studied the changes that you did. What I expected was that you would change:
------------------
projectHelper.attachArtifact(project, "zip", null, new
File(outputDirectory, finalName));
->
projectHelper.attachArtifact(project, "zip", installer, new
File(outputDirectory, finalName));
-------------------
Then I could reference the artifacts this way:
-------------------------
</plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>copy</id>
<phase>generate-resources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>copy-dependencies</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/tmp-hotdeploy</outputDirectory>
<includeTypes>zip</includeTypes>
<excludeTypes>jar</excludeTypes>
<excludeTransitive>true</excludeTransitive>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>myGroupId</groupId>
<artifactId>myServiceAssembly</artifactId>
<version>DYNAMIC-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
<classifier>installer</classifier>
<type>zip</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
-----------------------------------------------------
My project got packaged and the problem is still there. I had to remove the
<classifier> from above example as the jbi-maven-plugin does not publish the
service assembly artifact with such classifier. And when I removed the
classifier, the copy-dependencies goal copies only the jar file to
${project.build.directory}/tmp-hotdeploy. So after your change, the plugin is
still publishing the artifacts with the same classifier -I mean both are
published without any classifier. And it's wrong according to the link I gave
above:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Missing-search-results-with-assembly-attached-artifacts-td131996.html
kari
> jbi maven plugin: service assembly & attached artifact
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-2008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-2008
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tooling
> Reporter: Kari J. Niemi
> Assignee: Lars Heinemann
>
> jbi maven plugin would seem the behave badly when creating a service
> assembly. At least when the pom file with packaging jbi-service-assembly
> contains only dependencies to jbi-service-units (and the project for that
> pom.xml does not contain any java code in src/main/java), the plugin first
> creates a jar, installs it as a _zip_, then creates the correct zip and
> installs it as an attached artifact.
> If I got it right from the plugins source code, it's contradicting the
> "correct way" that's referred here:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Missing-search-results-with-assembly-attached-artifacts-td131996.html
> "What happens in those cases is that you end up with empty jar, and a zip
> that has _same_ coordinates as main artifact, but only different extension.
> Since Nexus reads POM to figure out the packaging, it will think in these two
> cases it is "JAR"."
> I ran in to this problem when trying to package the service assebly using the
> maven-rpm-plugin. When using dependencies to package the rpm, it just keeps
> packing the jar whiles of the service assembly -not the zip file at all. I
> suppose it's because the jar & zip files have the same maven coordinates.
> With the BCs/SEs the zip file gets the classifier "installer", and with that
> I can get the BC/SE zip file to the rpm(but I'm also getting the jar there
> even if I'm setting the dependency type to zip...)
> maven 2.09,2.2.1,3 tried. latest beta of maven-rpm-plugin,
> jbi-maven-plugin:4.0,4.3...errrr....at least some combinations of these...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
