Jamie, No problem at all, we still have a jbi-maven-plugin and JBI component set to vote on before we get to the NMR/Features stage, so we'll gladly pick up Karaf 2.1.2 by the time we get there.
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ 2010/11/25 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: > On 3/ > > The vote for Karaf 2.1.2 is almost over (in the next few hours) and > looks like it will pass :) The 2.1.2 contains a bunch of bug fixes > that I think Servicemix users would appreciate having resolved. > > Apache Karaf 2.1.2 release notes: > http://karaf.apache.org/karaf-212-release.html > > If all goes well I'll have the latest version promoted this afternoon. > As this would be a fresh release would you want to hold back for a > little while in order to pick it up, or better to go with the > established 2.1.1 release? > > 2010/11/25 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>: >> Hi I have nothing to say in release roadmap (agree with you). The website >> stuff is a bit harder because I don't have webdesigner available. I may help >> with moving static html to scalate but I afraid that my CSS knowledge is not >> sufficient to create cross browser websites. I propose to move this to >> another thread to avoid spamming release plan discussion. >> >> Best regards, >> Lukasz >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:06 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: ServiceMix 4.3 release roadmap >> >> Thanks for your feedback Gert. My comments inline: >> >>> On 1/ and 2/: >>> We have already done a servicemix-utils 1.3.0 release a few weeks ago, >>> I just updated the JIRA issue to reflect his but the artifacts >>> themselves are already on central repo. For the jbi-maven-plugin, >>> I've been waiting for >>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-2008 to get sorted out, >>> but since it's already been a few weeks since we heard back from Kari, >>> we can probably go ahead with this today. >> I will submit the JBI maven plugin vote today. I'm fixing some small >> issues on that and I'm making some tests. >> >>> >>> On 4/: >>> We should first try to make sure that the components source is >>> actually building fine again. We haven't had a successful Hudson >>> build for a while now. If the jbi-maven-plugin vote goes well, I >>> should have some spare time early next week to actually cut the >>> components release. One other thing though - in the most recent >>> documentation codebase, we are pulling some documentation from the >>> xbean-maven-plugin generated stuff. How about we do a quick two day >>> hackaton on Friday and Monday to get the javadocs updated a bit first? >> +1 for a hackaton. I run all build successfully on my box yesterday. I >> will make a new run today using JBI maven plugin 4.4-SNAPSHOT and others >> dependencies update. >> >>> >>> On 5/: >>> Yeah, I'm hoping I can come back to those next week as well -- not >>> sure we should aim to get a release out at the same time as the >>> container this first time around. It might be better to get as much >>> as possible done and published on the website and then await the first >>> feedback from our 4.3.0 users and get that included as well. Once we >>> have a more stable and proof-read docs base, we can start thinking >>> about aligning the release cycles. >> Maybe we can make a documenaton too :). Let say tuesday, wednesday, >> thursday and friday of the next week ? >> >>> >>> On 6/: >>> I think we mainly need to work on getting Lukasz proposal materialized >>> into the website project (like add the images, css, ... stuff required >>> to get that look and feel) so we can work on generating some nice >>> contents with the template and staging a preview copy for people to >>> look at. >> Yeah. Maybe we can ask to Lukasz to provide some material for that ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> ------------------------ >>> FuseSource >>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I would like to make a checkpoint on the ServiceMix 4.3 release. >>>> >>>> 1/ Release ServiceMix Utils 1.3.0 >>>> Regarding the Jira tasks, we don't have blocking issues on utils. >>>> I propose to release it today. >>>> >>>> 2/ Release JBI Maven Plugin 4.4 >>>> Regarding the Jira tasks, we don't have blocking issues on JBI maven >> plugin. >>>> I propose to release it today. >>>> >>>> 3/ Upgrade to Karaf 2.1.1 and ServiceMix Specs 1.6.0 >>>> As Karaf 2.1.1 is quite released and ServiceMix Specs 1.6.0 has been >>>> release, I propose to check in all ServiceMix modules that we use it. >>>> >>>> 4/ ServiceMix Components 2010.02 >>>> I propose to gear up components release. I'm gonna make a review on >>>> components' Jira tasks to see the one that should be included in the >> 2010.02 >>>> release. >>>> I would like to include two news components too: servicemix-ldap (quite >>>> completed) and servicemix-rmi (I have to work on the RMI to XML data >>>> binding). >>>> >>>> 5/ Documentation and User Manual >>>> I would like to include the "new" documentation, especially the user >> guide >>>> in the release. >>>> Gert raised all Jira tasks around that. I will pick up some to >> create/update >>>> the user guide. Any help is welcome :) >>>> >>>> 6/ Website promotion >>>> Lukasz made a great work on the ServiceMix logo and website. >>>> I think that we have to promote it as soon as possible. It will give more >>>> visibility on ServiceMix 4 and should increase the users community. >>>> Is there any blocking point about this ? >>>> @Lukasz, @Gert, @Chris, could we work together about this topic ? >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >> >> >
