Jean-Baptiste,

Sounds good - I'll ping you on Monday to coordinate about the best
time to start the release.

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/



On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gert,
>
> I would like to fix some issues on components before releasing. I do my best 
> this week end to fix the max.
>
> Regards
> JB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:02:34
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Getting ready for components 2010.02 release
>
> L.S.,
>
> Previous release tags have been copied into the
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/components/tags/ directory,
> the new location has been documented in
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Building+JBI+Components
> and the Hudson CI build has been updated to use the new trunk
> location.  I'll await a first run of the CI build and once everything
> looks OK, I'll remove the old locations from the svn repo and prepare
> for a components' release on Monday.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Checkout and build in progress on my side.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 12/09/2010 11:32 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>> All the JBI components have been moved back into a a single svn tree
>>> location in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/components/trunk/.
>>>  Please give it a go and let me know if there's any issues with this
>>> new components build.  I'll start moving the tags together into a
>>> single tags directory tomorrow morning and after that we can remove
>>> the old (per component) svn repository structure to end up with a
>>> default trunk/branches/tags layout again for the JBI components.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Awesome, thanks a lot Gert.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 12/08/2010 03:08 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to start the migration process.  It's probably best to
>>>>> refrain from committing to the components codebase until the initial
>>>>> svn move operation has been done to avoid losing commits in the
>>>>> process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to gather components in a single svn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/07/2010 10:56 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2010-12-6, at 下午9:01, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that the jbi-maven-plugin 4.4 has been released, I'd like to
>>>>>>>> prepare for a components 2010.02 release later this week (e.g. on
>>>>>>>> Thursday or Friday). We'll have to upgrade the builds to use the
>>>>>>>> latest release versions of specs/utils/jbi-maven-plugin and I'm also
>>>>>>>> working on adding more javadocs to the endpoint setters to get more
>>>>>>>> content in the auto-generated xsd/wiki documentation (any help
>>>>>>>> welcome
>>>>>>>> btw ;)).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We now have separate trunk/branches/tags folders for every component,
>>>>>>>> but we never really leveraged this structure (i.e. we never did many
>>>>>>>> single component releases) in the past. Now that the future of
>>>>>>>> ServiceMix will focus less on JBI, I think the overhead of the
>>>>>>>> separate trunk/branches probably outweighs the benefits.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was originally planning to propose to move the JBI components back
>>>>>>>> into a single svn tree location after this release, but we might as
>>>>>>>> well bite the bullet and get that done for this release as well (it
>>>>>>>> also simplifies the release process if it's just a single build to
>>>>>>>> run). Jean-Baptiste has already done a lot of work in cleaning up the
>>>>>>>> component POMs and aligning dependencies through a common dependency
>>>>>>>> management section in components-pom, so I should be able to get the
>>>>>>>> actual svn moves done over the next few days just in time for the
>>>>>>>> release. Any objections/thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for moving the JBI components back into a single svn tree before
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Freeman
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And finally, there's a few more new bundles waiting to get released
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> well (see current list in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/bundles/trunk/pom.xml).
>>>>>>>> While I'm in 'release mode' anyway, I figured I could do those as
>>>>>>>> well. Could you make sure that the bundles you want to get released
>>>>>>>> are listed in the pom.xml file?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to