+1 on 2

/je

On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:

> L.S.,
> 
> 
> Originally, we were planning to release ServiceMix 4.3.0 with Camel
> 2.5 and we already released components and NMR to use that version.
> However, with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-652 we're
> running into an issue with that version of Camel (cfr.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3302).  One way to fix
> this would be to redo the components release and add a hack as a
> workaround for this issue.  We could do that today or tomorrow and get
> the release process back on track that way.
> 
> However, the Camel 2.6.0 release is due to get cut anytime soon,
> they're currently waiting on our pending bundles vote to move ahead.
> I think it would be worth waiting another week and then restart the
> release process using Camel 2.6.0 and CXF 2.3.1 instead of the current
> versions.  That would allow us to pick up the latest versions of those
> two important frameworks in ServiceMix as well as avoid the hack
> around the issue in the components build.
> 
> If we go for option 2, I would like to suggest we're careful about
> adding new stuff to the Components/NMR/Features build in the
> meanwhile.  The first two have already been released a few weeks ago
> without any problems, so if we only fix bugs and update the Camel and
> CXF version, we can be a bit more confident in the upcoming new
> release builds and votes.
> 
> The quiet period between now and the releases would be a great time to
> start the documentation hackaton by the way ;)
> 
> 
> Wdyt?
> 
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to