We will discuss that with Manning editor but having two separate books will not help end users and will be responsible on redundancy with the content. ServiceMix will be focused on Karaf, Aries and new features provided top of the platform (so JBI will not be covered anymore but NMR well). Writing a book about ServiceMix 4 without karaf does not have any sense.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that a separate Apache Karaf book would be nice to see, > unfortunately in order to really get the most out of SMX4 a fare > amount of Karaf needs to be explained :S Perhaps there would be enough > interest with the publisher to have a pure 'Karaf in Action' book made > as well? > > J > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Rocco Gallo Citera > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, All > > If you dont mind the opinion of someone who has been following the > > Servicemix project since several years ago, I think that both Karaf > > and Servicemix are complex enough to have each a book on its own. Even > > if Karaf is the core of Servicemix, its an excelent product by itself > > and has too many features to explore that a book could be written. > > Servicemix could be explained without deep knowledge of Karaf and the > > SMX 3 version is a great product that should not be easy dismiss. > > Interactions, set up, concepts, there are lots of things to be > > explored in a book about each. Its a great idea and I look forward to > > read the book. > > Thats my humble opinion. > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Charles Moulliard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi JB, All, > >> > >> We have started a discussion regarding to the Manning book name a > >> couple of weeks ago and the idea was you propose to use karaf + smx in > >> the title name or as a subtitle. We have to re-discuss this point with > >> the editor soon. I hope also that in the meantime, Aries 0.3 will be > >> published because we would like to cover some interesting topics like > >> Aries Transaction, JPA, ... with camel on Smx. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Charles Moulliard > >> > >> Sr. Principal Solution Architect - FuseSource > >> Apache Committer > >> > >> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard > >> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard > >> Skype: cmoulliard > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Adrian Trenaman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hi JB, > >>> > >>> I think you're right! My feeling is though that 'ServiceMix in Action' > naturally will be renamed 'ServiceMix and Karaf in Action' by the time it is > published, as the Karaf core is so fundamental to modern ServiceMix. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ade > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 02:12 AM > >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; dev < > [email protected]> > >>> Subject: Karaf & ServiceMix In Action > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> several weeks ago, Charles launched the idea of a ServiceMix In Action > >>> book, as Claus and the others wrote Camel In Action. > >>> > >>> I think that we're all agree that before starting this such book, we > need: > >>> - to release ServiceMix 4.3.0 and ServiceMix 3.3.3, with all required > >>> dependencies (components, etc) > >>> - to work on the documentation and website > >>> > >>> Anyway, ServiceMix In Action is really a good idea and will improve the > >>> visibility of the project. > >>> However, I think that ServiceMix is too restrictive. > >>> > >>> I propose to think about "Karaf & ServiceMix In Action". > >>> > >>> The book could be split into two big sections: > >>> - Karaf from user and dev point of view > >>> - ServiceMix 4 and the usage of Karaf, with a special focus on NMR > >>> > >>> What do you think ? > >>> > >>> We can add this on our huge TODO list :) > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >> > > > -- -- Charles Moulliard - Sr. Principal Solution Architect FuseSource Phone: +32 473 604 014 Email: [email protected] Web: http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com, http://fusesource.com Twitter: cmoulliard "The experts in open source integration and messaging." <http://www.progress.com/>
