+1

On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Rob Davies wrote:

> +1
> On 2 Feb 2011, at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We solved 14 issues in this release:
>> [SMXCOMP-844] Possibility to choose preemptive Authentication for the http 
>> provider endpoint.
>> [SMXCOMP-842] Upgrade to CXF 2.3.2
>> [SMXCOMP-841] Upgrade to Camel 2.6.0
>> [SMXCOMP-845] http provider processor - simple response content type check 
>> missing which can lead to errors.
>> [SMXCOMP-849] ServiceType needs to be configurable on SMPP endpoints
>> [SMXCOMP-835] upgrade to cxf 2.3.1
>> [SMXCOMP-834] Some unit tests in servicemix-http sometimes fail because they 
>> use ports being taken by existing applications.
>> [SMXCOMP-836] EndpointExporter should unregister the endpoint with it if 
>> failed to create a ServiceAssembly
>> [SMXCOMP-837] should remove wsdl definition from bus cache when shutdown the 
>> cxfbc consumer endpoint
>> [SMXCOMP-734] RMI consumer endpoint raised an InvocationTargetException in 
>> place of the target one
>> [SMXCOMP-843] The old provider processor has no possibilty to bind the Auth 
>> scope on a host:port config
>> [SMXCOMP-839] incorrect OSGi manifest metadata of servicemix-exec component
>> [SMXCOMP-840] Upgrade to Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE
>> |SMXCOMP-853] CXF SE is not able to build to bundle issue
>> 
>> There are still 25 opened issues and 5 reopened:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+SMXCOMP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%222011.01%22+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+SMXCOMP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%222011.01%22+AND+status+%3D+Reopened+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>> 
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-022/
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
> 

Reply via email to