Hi, Regarding to the new name of NMR, we could use another acronym --> SML = ServiceMix Messaging Layer or EML = Endpoints Messaging Layer as the main goal of this component will be to deliver messages to endpoints exposed in bundles or in another SMX instances, will also handle transaction between transactional endpoints, audit messages, provide a registry to locate endpoints registered and least but not least provide clustering or clouding
Regards, Charles Moulliard Sr. Principal Solution Architect - FuseSource Apache Committer Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard Skype: cmoulliard On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't want to split NMR. NMR (or the new proposed name, ServiceMix GL) IS > ServiceMix 4 :). > In fact ServiceMix 4 is a premium integration platform for other projects > (Karaf, CXF, Camel, ActiveMQ, ODE, etc) and the NMR. > > So basically my answer is no, I prefer to keep NMR as the main ServiceMix > project. > > Regards > JB > > On 03/01/2011 09:42 PM, Michael Van wrote: >> >> I was a proponent of splitting NMR off of SMX and making it its very own >> TLP. >> But, if you guys are going to integrate it deeper into SMX, I can see >> where >> that wouldnt' work. ;-) >> >
