L.S.,

Here's my +1 - just noticed one minor issue with the archetype-catalog
artifacts (cfr. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2121) but I don't
think anyone is actually using that feature so let's fix that for the next
release

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/


On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> currently, we have two binding vote (Freeman and I). To be able to release
> this archetypes version, we need an additional PMC vote.
>
> It would be highly appreciated if a PMC can review and vote on this
> release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 08/08/2011 01:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in order to align the ServiceMix Components and the ServiceMix
>> Archetypes, I submit a new version of the ServiceMix Archetypes using
>> the 2010.02 version of the ServiceMix Components.
>>
>> After this release, I will submit another one to your vote, using
>> 2011.01 components.
>>
>> We fixed the following issues in this release:
>>
>> ** Bug
>> * [SM-2002] - Maven3 is not happy with poms
>> * [SM-2015] - servicemix camel archtype generates camel-context.xml with
>> wrong namespace
>> * [SM-2112] - Component archetypes should create the blueprint descriptor
>>
>> ** Improvement
>> * [SM-1946] - Upgrade archetypes and provide a clean version
>> * [SM-2022] - Replace commons logging in servicemix-camel-osgi-bundle
>> archetype with java.util.logging to simplify example
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>> orgapacheservicemix-004/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-004/>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to