On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote: > L.S., > > > Thanks for reporting this! Looks like we (or rather I) missed a > property while switching from our own activemq-camel feature to the > one provided by ActiveMQ itself. That's fixed now in > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/features/trunk/assemblies/apache-servicemix/src/main/filtered-resources/features.xml?r1=1459180&r2=1459179&pathrev=1459180 > > The fix is pretty easy and we could just add it to the release notes, > but since this is a pretty key example and it's even the first example > in the features list, I would be inclined to cancel the vote and just > recut the release with that one fix in it. It would cost us a few > days for the new vote to be organized, but nothing else changes in the > meanwhile so it should be a fairly straightforward release to cut > today. > > > Wdyt? >
Yeah if you have the time then re-cut. > Gert Vanthienen > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:43 AM, wverreydt <[email protected]> wrote: >> I still have a error on running the "examples-activemq-camel-blueprint" >> feature. >> It states: "No feature named 'activemq-camel' with version '4.5.1' >> available" >> This should be using activemq-camel 5.7.0 I think? >> >> Regards, >> Wim >> (intern at Gert) >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-ServiceMix-4-5-1-tp5716151p5716169.html >> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
