L.S.,
256 MB sounds like a fair value to me as well. Once it's added to Karaf, we probably won't have to do anything in ServiceMix once we can pick up a new version, so that sounds even better ;) I'll raise the JIRA for ServiceMix 5 anyway so we can at least keep track of it. Also, good to hear about the new Metaspace memory for Java 8. I do wonder how this will affect production systems: most people will probably want to leave the default setting to "unbounded", but I can imagine some users will want to limit the amount of metaspace that can be used so we might have to do the opposite for Java 8 and provide a new environment variable in the Karaf scripts to limit this again. Regards, Gert Vanthienen On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with it, though starting with Java 7 the PermSpace is removed from > the JVM (due to merge of JRockit and HotSpot implementation) So I'm not > sure how long this "issue" will still be present :) > Also take a look at [1] > > regards, Achim > > [1] - > http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.de/2011/10/java-7-features-permgen-removal.html > > > 2013/4/4 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> On Karaf, we noticed an increase of the Perm when using a lot of bundles >> refresh. >> >> Agree with Freeman, it makes sense to increase in Karaf as well. >> >> Maybe 256m is a fair value. WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 04/04/2013 08:09 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: >> >>> +1 to give a bigger default size, and I think we even need change it on >>> Karaf side also >>> －－－－－－－－－－－－－ >>> Freeman(Yue) Fang >>> >>> Red Hat, Inc. >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ >>> Twitter: freemanfang >>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042> >>> weibo: @Freeman小屋 >>> >>> On 2013-4-4, at 下午1:51, Claus Ibsen wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> Isn't even 128MB a low value today? >>>> Shouldn't we raise it to a higher value? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Gert Vanthienen >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> L.S., >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Today, I ran into two occasions where the default PermGen memory >>>>> configuration was insufficient, first while installing the new >>>>> camel-drools demo that was created today and secondly when installing >>>>> a moderately large web project for testing purposes. >>>>> >>>>> Would it make sense to increase the PermGen size to 128 MB out of the >>>>> box? I can imagine if I bump into this a few times in a row, some of >>>>> our users are bound to see the same thing happening too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gert Vanthienen >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Claus Ibsen >>>> ----------------- >>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>> Twitter: davsclaus >>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> > Commiter & Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
