Yes, I will. Consider GWT 2.6.0 is not yet released, (Release is expected within next two weeks)
Cristiano Il giorno sabato 7 dicembre 2013, Jean-Baptiste Onofré ha scritto: > Sure, I created the Jira to track it. > > I will create a first bundle, feel free to review and provide your > feedback ! > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On 12/07/2013 02:05 PM, Cristiano Costantini wrote: > > Ok, good, > I'll check it. > > I have worked a lot in the past weeks to test GWT on servicemix also by > adapting many examples, and I have many considerations to provide, please > take some time to take into account my feedback ;-) > > Cristiano > > > > Il giorno sabato 7 dicembre 2013, Jean-Baptiste Onofré ha scritto: > > FYI: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1634 > > Regards > JB > > On 12/07/2013 01:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi Christiano, > > I already did the gwt bundles in the past. > > I gonna create new gwt bundles (for 2.6.0) and include it in the next > 2013.12 release. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/07/2013 01:35 PM, Cristiano Costantini wrote: > > Hi All, > > as there is no so many interest on supporting OSGi in the GWT community > (the related issue has only 5 votes: > https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8424 and I > know all of those who have starred it :-D ), > I wonder if it is more appropriate to make OSGi release > under org.apache.servicemix.bundles. > > It has been done in the past (for > "org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix. > bundles.gwt-user/2.4.0_1" > > and > "org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix. > bundles.gwt-dev/2.4.0_1"). > > > Now it is going to be released GWT version 2.6.0 and I believe it > should be > released only gwt-servlet artifact with OSGi headers (so > "org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix. > bundles.gwt-servlet/2.6.0_1"). > > > > Could someone point me to the right process (where is the source code of > org.apache.servicemix.bundles.*, where to open related issues, where to > discuss them, who to involve in the approval process) so I can try to > push > and support for this proposal? > > > Thank you!!! > Cristiano > > > > > > > 2013/11/19 Cristiano Costantini <[email protected]> > > Hi all! > Just an update about my ongoing effort to OSGIfy GWT. > > I did proposed a patch to GWT community and to validate it I've > adapted 5 > significant examples from the GWT distribution to run on Apache Karaf, > (more precisely I used ServiceMix 4.5.3 but I'm not using neither Camel, > CXF or ActiveMQ). > > You can find the examples here: > https://github.com/cristcost/gwt-karaf-examples > > They require GWT compiled using this patch of mine > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5351/ > If someone want to try them out, I will be glad to help and give more > detailed instructions. > > Actually there is no so much interest from GWT community, so I would > like > you all supporting me by starring the related issue: > https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8424 > and if you are interested, apply to > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/and perform a (non binding) > review of > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5351/ so that the patch can be > noticed more. > > > The patch is not yet ideal, as the .bnd file contains some > "workaround" to > address complex dependencies in the GWT jar, but I hope these can be > addressed by a refactoring in GWT package structure in next release. > Also, > there is a rare issue when two applications are deployed together and > use > "com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.server.RequestFactoryServlet". > Anyhow I would like it to be approved for the upcoming final release of > GWT 2.6.0 which is expected beginning of december, so that community can > start developing first prototype applications using this architecture. > > To go back to the examples, they actually don't make full use of OSGi > capabilities (no OSGi service is used for this) but me and some > friends are > working on a *full* demo application that make use of the full > ServiceMix > stack and have a GW > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
