I'm ok with this name change as long as it has no side effects with the developments.
Else, I think it is acceptable to have a servicemix 4.9 developed under a repository named servicemix 5; consider it as when you start a new project and you give it the version 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT with the meaning of a "version that is not yet 1.0.0" Il domenica 16 febbraio 2014, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi all > > Apart from the result of the vote about releasing ServiceMix based on Karf > 3.x or not, I'd like to propose to rename the current repository > servicemix5 to servicemix, as this repository should contain next > ServiceMix releases (we can move the current code base in a new branch > servicemix-4.9.x and start the new codebase for ServiceMix 5 on trunk). It > means we should also rename the git repository in Apache and Github. > > Regards > Krzysztof > > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center < > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > Twitter: @KSobkowiak >
