+1

Best,

Christian
-----------------

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Member
V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
Apache Incubator PMC Member

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1, especially for using Karaf 3.0.1 with Servicemix 5,
>
> Karaf 3.0.1 because we already identified some rather nasty bugs with Karaf
> that shouldn't spoil a ServiceMix 5 ;)
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2014-02-14 10:55 GMT+01:00 Cristiano Costantini <
> [email protected]>:
>
> > My opinion:
> > Servicemix 5.0.0 -> Karaf 3.0.0
> > then branch and Servicemix 4.9.0 -> latest Karaf 2.3.x
> >
> > this because jumping from 2.2.11 to 3.0.0 may be a big step and it's good
> > to have something in between
> > and I would assign this the version number 4.9 to mark it is still big
> step
> > that discontinues from the previous versions, and something that leads to
> > the next big revision
> >
> > (I remember that firefox did something like this from version 3.1 to 3.5
> so
> > to mark the big changes even if not upgrading to major version, this
> before
> > startying to release a new version every 6 weeks :-) )
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-14 10:14 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Due to the training for my company I couldn't follow the whole
> discussion
> > > about future of ServiceMix5. Are we going to upgrade it to Karaf 3.x or
> > > will it be released on basis of Karaf 2.x?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Krzysztof
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13.02.2014 09:53, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> > >
> > >> L.S.,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Moving the discussion from the users@ to dev@ mailing list, it would
> > >> be good to figure out how to go about things.
> > >>
> > >> For now, I would propose we avoid adding any extra complexity and just
> > >> focus on getting a simple assembly project in place that combines the
> > >> latest and greatest bits of ActiveMQ, CXF, Camel, Karaf, ...
> > >>
> > >> How about we start with the ServiceMix 5 codebase, remove the new
> > >> Camel interceptor bits for now and just focus on getting the assembly
> > >> itself, the examples and the integration tests working?  That way, we
> > >> should have a fairly manageable amount of work to perform before we
> > >> can get to a new release.
> > >>
> > >> We have a board report coming up in March, so we can convey this new
> > >> direction in that. Perhaps we should use the next board report after
> > >> that as a checkpoint to see if we are making any progress: by then, I
> > >> think we should have been able to do at least one or two releases and
> > >> we should have found a few people that are willing/able to help out
> > >> with the work. If we have not made any progress on the community
> > >> aspect by then, it may be a good time to reflect on how to gracefully
> > >> move people over to a plain Karaf/CXF/Camel/... solution instead.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Wdyt?
> > >>
> > >> Gert Vanthienen
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Krzysztof Sobkowiak
> > >
> > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
> > > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <
> > > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> > > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
> > > Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
> Commiter & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>

Reply via email to