+1
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://wwx.talend.com > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > > From: "Cristiano Costantini" <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving the servicemix5 codebase to git > > Date: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 9:02 am > > > > > > I agree and support this migration, > > Git works better for OS projects. > > > > Cristiano > > > > > > > > 2014-03-25 14:00 GMT+01:00 Robert Davies <[email protected]>: > > > >> I think we should do it. > >> > >> On 25 Mar 2014, at 12:58, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> L.S., > >>> > >>> > >>> It's been brought up a few times before that it would be nice to be > >>> able to switch from SVN to git. Now that we have the entire ServiceMix > >>> 5 code living in a single source repository again, that would make a > >>> good first candidate to make the switch. We could ask infra@ to > >>> convert the contents of SVN and make that our main servicemix.git > >>> repository. > >>> > >>> > >>> Wdyt? > >>> > >>> Gert Vanthienen > >> > >> Rob Davies > >> ---------------- > >> Red Hat, Inc > >> Twitter: rajdavies > >> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com > >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >> > >> > >
