+1 We should add karaf user as workaround for activemq console and apply your proposal for the camel drools itest problem.
I'm back on thursday. Best regards Krzysztof On May 13, 2014 1:42 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> wrote: > L.S., > > > I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to > apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and > figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web > console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1 > release in my mind. > > Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in, > how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll > cut the release tomorrow? > > > Regards, > > Gert Vanthienen >
