I have tested Karaf 2.4 snapshot with ActiveMQ and Camel. It looks ok. I wonder why I couldn't reproduce our problem with ActiveMQ quick start and deploy folder on this Karaf version. Is it already corrected in all Karaf branches or it has never existed in Karaf 2.4?
Best regards Krzysztof On 14.07.2014 12:47, Sobkowiak, Krzysztof wrote: > +1 for SMX 5.0.3 and 5.1.1 with current code base and 5.0.4 and 5.1.2 > with Karaf 2.3.6. > +1 for SMX 5.2.x with Karaf 2.4.0 > > With SMX 6 we should wait until Karaf 3.0.2 is available and contains > the fix for the deploy folder problem. > > Best regards > Krzysztof > > > On 14.07.2014 12:28, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >> L.S., >> >> >> It's not that a lot has happened on ServiceMix itself since the >> previous 5.0.2 and 5.1.0 releases, but the upgrades of Camel and CXF >> probably mean more to our user base than anything else. Doing a >> release isn't that much of an effort these days, so I think it makes >> sense to plan to do 5.0.3 and 5.1.1 release (perhaps later this week >> or early next week). Wdyt? >> >> Also, with a Karaf 2.4.0 in the works, we should probably also start >> getting ready to provide a corresponding ServiceMix release once >> that's out. In my mind, that's too big an upgrade to do in a >> micro/bugfix release, so perhaps we should set up a 5.2.x branch to >> work on that? >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center > <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > Twitter: @KSobkowiak > Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Twitter: @KSobkowiak Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
