czw., 30 sty 2020 o 08:13 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> Good point and actually I was thinking about improving pax-url-wrap.
>

Great - it could be based on wrap:. But with clear distinction IMO:
 - wrap: is using bndlib and the URI parameters are BND instructions
 - wrap2: (or desc: or whatever) is NOT using bndlib and everything is just
in external manifest

the external manifest of course could have tooling to generate it, but the
point should be "generate/write once". wrap: is generating manifest on each
resolution.

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek


>
>
> On 30/01/2020 08:12, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> > czw., 30 sty 2020 o 08:07 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It's more than just manifest.
> >>
> >> And I think it's better to only have the descriptor location on the URL
> >> nothing else.
> >> All should be described in the descriptor (locations of the jar
> >> resources, meta/headers, ...).
> >>
> >
> > Do you think it can be done at pax-url level? Everything that works is
> > great. I think the most important goal is to NOT require an ASF release
> > (i.e., SMX bundles with build, repackaging and deployment). THough if
> it's
> > part of Karaf, we'll need a vote and release anyway. I'll think about it
> in
> > the background ;)
> >
> > regards
> > Grzegorz Grzybek
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> On 30/01/2020 08:01, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> śr., 29 sty 2020 o 10:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >> napisał(a):
> >>>
> >>>> Good point ;)
> >>>>
> >>>> What about bundledesc ?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Naming is hard ;) manifest:// maybe?
> >>>
> >>> I imagined also this scenario - if this manifest is an XML file (or
> JSON,
> >>> or whatever structured doc), it could contain MORE than one manifest.
> For
> >>> example a manifest for "tomcat" or for "spring framework" usually
> sharing
> >>> groupId. So a manifest could be e.g.,
> >>>
> >>
> bundledesc:mvn:org.apache.karaf.bundles/spring-framework/5.1.9.RELEASE?id=spring-core
> >>> (or similar) meaning that the bundle description should be fetched from
> >>> mvn:org.apache.karaf.bundles/spring-framework/5.1.9.RELEASE and in
> >>> particular - from "spring-core" section of this manifest.
> >>>
> >>> But that's just an idea.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>> On 29/01/2020 08:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >>>>> śr., 29 sty 2020 o 08:42 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The descriptor will a URL, so, they can be embedded in Karaf and
> then
> >> we
> >>>>>> can use file: URL, or available on Karaf website/Maven Central, and
> >> then
> >>>>>> we can use mvn or http URL as well.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The bundle generator descriptor will contain the META and the
> >> overriding
> >>>>>> resources locations.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For instance:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> my-bundle-descriptor-1.0.json
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> "base-location": "mvn:....jar",
> >>>>>> "Import-Package": "...",
> >>>>>> "Export-Package": "...",
> >>>>>> "resources":["mvn...jar","..."]
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I already started a PoC like this while ago introducing a new URL
> >>>>>> handler "bundle:".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This looks cool - exactly what I was thinking about - instead of
> >> relying
> >>>> on
> >>>>> (76 character wide) META-INF/MANIFEST.MF embedded in JAR (sometimes
> >> bad,
> >>>>> because sometimes authors of libraries do not know much about OSGi),
> >>>> have a
> >>>>> descriptor pointing to a location of (possibly not OSGi-aware) a
> >> library.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But I'd use different protocol than "bundle:" which is used by
> Felix, I
> >>>>> think.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards
> >>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 29/01/2020 08:32, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Good idea about not having it as part of featuresService
> >>>>>> (featuresProcessor
> >>>>>>> in Kara == Overrides v2). So getting closer to wrap: (wrap2: ?).
> >> Indeed
> >>>>>>> keeping some generic descriptors instead of
> building/voting/releasing
> >>>> SMX
> >>>>>>> bundles and generating actual bundles on the fly would be a good
> >> idea.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Where those descriptors could be stored? In some Karaf subdirectory
> >>>> maybe
> >>>>>>> (etc/)? Currently I see 413 subdirectories of
> >>>>>>> github/apache/servicemix-bundles repo, All of those could be in
> >> single
> >>>>>> XML
> >>>>>>> file. If some SMX (and soon Karaf-Bundles?) bundles need some
> >>>> additional
> >>>>>>> resources, this generic (by default) generator descriptor could be
> >>>>>> tweaked
> >>>>>>> to load/shade/repackage additional resources...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Anyway - I see it can be changed without huge effort.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> regards
> >>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> śr., 29 sty 2020 o 08:22 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Greg,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For bundles, as separate project, I have more the idea of
> >>>> "descriptor".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's something I proposed while ago.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Instead of storing the concrete artifacts, I would rather store
> the
> >>>>>> meta.
> >>>>>>>> However, some bundles needs "resources" (like META-INF/foo or
> code).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, basically, I agree with a "dynamic" processing, however, I
> don't
> >>>>>>>> think it's good to have this in feature.
> >>>>>>>> I would rather add a "bundle generator" service, generic, that can
> >>>>>>>> easily be used outside Karaf.
> >>>>>>>> The bundle generator service can read artifact from Central or any
> >>>>>>>> repository, than, he reads META descriptor and overriding
> resources
> >>>>>>>> (from karaf-bundles repo for instances) and generates a concrete
> >>>> bundle
> >>>>>>>> on the fly.
> >>>>>>>> Big advantage is that it's easy to change the META/bundle on the
> >> fly.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 29/01/2020 07:59, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hello
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I can't tell much about SMX, but I fully agree about focusing on
> >>>> Karaf.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> About specs/bundles - good to have them as separate projects of
> >> Karaf
> >>>>>>>> (but
> >>>>>>>>> not in the same github/apache/karaf repo!), but for bundles I may
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> different proposal... There's
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6200 for which I
> have
> >>>>>> local
> >>>>>>>>> implementation. I needed a mechanism to declaratively override
> >>>> bundle's
> >>>>>>>>> headers without touching the bundle. Similar to what we have with
> >>>>>> feature
> >>>>>>>>> override/blacklisting.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> KARAF-6200 reuses etc/org.apache.karaf.feature.xml file and adds
> >>>>>>>> something
> >>>>>>>>> like this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <bundleProcessing>
> >>>>>>>>>     <bundle location="mvn:org.eclipse.jetty*/*">
> >>>>>>>>>         <add header="Processed-By" value="Karaf Bundle Processor"
> >> />
> >>>>>>>>>         <clause header="Import-Package" name="javax.servlet"
> >>>>>>>>> value='javax.servlet;version="[3.1.0,5)"' />
> >>>>>>>>>         <clause header="Import-Package"
> >>>> name="javax.servlet.annotation"
> >>>>>>>>> value='javax.servlet.annotation;version="[3.1.0,5)"' />
> >>>>>>>>>         <clause header="Import-Package"
> >>>> name="javax.servlet.descriptor"
> >>>>>>>>> value='javax.servlet.descriptor;version="[3.1.0,5)"' />
> >>>>>>>>>         <clause header="Import-Package" name="javax.servlet.http"
> >>>>>>>>> value='javax.servlet.http;version="[3.1.0,5)"' />
> >>>>>>>>>     </bundle>
> >>>>>>>>> </bundleProcessing>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> which does exactly what it shows - for all bundles (installed
> with
> >>>>>>>>> features) with URI matching "mvn:org.eclipse.jetty*/*" we alter
> >>>>>> manifest
> >>>>>>>>> clauses. I didn't need this mechanism after all, because I could
> >> make
> >>>>>>>> Jetty
> >>>>>>>>> run with Servlet API 4 using "compatibility fragment bundle" that
> >>>> adds
> >>>>>>>>> extended exports to javax.servlet:javax.servlet-api.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What I was thinking about (even back in 2009
> >>>>>>>>> <
> >> https://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread/53803.html#305391
> >>>>> )
> >>>>>>>> is to
> >>>>>>>>> maybe extend the above mechanism to get rid of SMX bundles
> >> entirely?
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> know, I know, there's "wrap:" protocol where you can specify
> >> headers
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>> URI
> >>>>>>>>> itself, but it's not that easy to use. So instead of releasing
> SMX
> >>>>>>>> bundles,
> >>>>>>>>> we can just release the above alteration definitions (somehow).
> >>>>>>>>> I know there are 10000 things I didn't think about (like what to
> do
> >>>> if
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>> don't use Karaf features where featuresService can apply the
> above
> >>>>>>>>> manipulation), but maybe it's worth trying?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> regards
> >>>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sty 2020 o 15:30 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> napisał(a):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I fully agree with you.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> My proposal is basically:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 1. Move SMX bundles and SMX specs as Karaf subproject
> >>>>>>>>>> 2. Create Karaf Integration distribution at Karaf (as we have
> >>>> standard
> >>>>>>>>>> and minimal distributions already)
> >>>>>>>>>> 3. Provide a migration guide for SMX users
> >>>>>>>>>> 4. Move ServiceMix project to attic
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 28/01/2020 15:27, Andrea Cosentino wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 on each point.
> >>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't do an 8.0.0 release, because we can't guarantee
> patch
> >>>>>>>>>> releases..
> >>>>>>>>>>> So I would go with attic and clearly states to use karaf
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>   Il mar, 28 gen, 2020 alle 15:01, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>> ha scritto:   Hi guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If the ServiceMix project is fairly active for SMX Bundles and
> >>>> Specs,
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>> clearly have a "slow pace" on distribution releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Here, we have two approaches possible:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. We clearly state on website and codebase that users should
> >>>> better
> >>>>>>>> use
> >>>>>>>>>>> Karaf and create their own custom distribution if needed.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. We begin a regular pace in distribution release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think 1 makes more sense and it's worth to be mentioned in
> the
> >>>> SMX
> >>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regarding 2, I would like to propose a ServiceMix 8.0.0 with:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Update to Karaf 4.2.x
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Update to Camel 3.0.1
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Update on Activity
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Cleanup and improved SMX features
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Add itests in smx for coverage
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Another more "important" decision would be to retire ServiceMix
> >> to
> >>>>>>>> attic
> >>>>>>>>>>> and move SMX Bundles and Specs as Karaf subprojects (as we have
> >>>> Karaf
> >>>>>>>>>>> Decanter, Cave, Cellar, ...).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think it's fair to discuss about that as we don't see lot of
> >>>>>> activity
> >>>>>>>>>>> on ServiceMix distribution/releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to