Come back to here since JIRA discussion sucks :)

I agree on your points. It is possible to use JMock in TestCase,
because JMockTestCase is a test case. The (for me) interesting method
in there is mock(Class clazz) which is basicly something like

<snip>
   public Mock mock( Class mockedType, String roleName ) {
       Mock newMock = new Mock(newCoreMock(mockedType, roleName));
       registerToVerify(newMock);
       return newMock;
   }
</snip>

So going the *other* way is sort of *re_implementing* JMock :) sorta!
No optimal way.
I can take a look on it, if you like that way much more

<hierachy_of_jmock>
org.jmock.cglib
Class MockObjectTestCase

java.lang.Object
 extended by junit.framework.Assert
     extended by junit.framework.TestCase
         extended by org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase
             extended by org.jmock.core.MockObjectSupportTestCase
                 extended by org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase
                     extended by org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase

All Implemented Interfaces:
   Test
</hierachy_of_jmock>

On 7/5/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at it now ...

Craig


On 7/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> anyone looked at SHALE-210 ?
>
> If ok from you I'd like to commit it.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-210
>
> thx,
> Matt
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> futher stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>




--
Matthias Wessendorf

futher stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to