great!
On 7/11/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GA means 1.0.3 ?
> instead 1.0.2.1 ?
If we continue the current path, the next release would be 1.0.3. If we do
it now, it seems that this should be targeted to be a beta, not a GA -- and
we could target 1.0.4 for GA.
Craig
On 7/11/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > any thoughts about a release of 1.0.3 ?
> > > In the test framework are several changes, that I like to have in a
> > > released JAR.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts ?
> >
> >
> > If we want to do one sooner rather than later, and assume it won't be GA
> > (due to Tiles and dialog issues), I'm game ... and I could RM one over
> the
> > next week or so. It makes sense to have one, not only for all the bug
> > fixes, but to comemorate our new home.
> >
> > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > futher stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> futher stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
futher stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
