On 12/31/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We had talked earlier about the idea of doing quality rankings on the
individual packages separately, so that we'd have a chance to grant a GA
quality vote on some remaining portion other than shale-tiles. If we
still
feel this way, I'd suggest modifying this text to something like this:
This is the fourth milestone release of Shale, released to encourage
experimentation
and gather feedback on usage issues and requested features. A full
vote
on quality
has yet to take place for this release, but will take place later. We
plan to vote on the
quality of each module separately (where necessary). For example, the
shale-tiles
module is likely to receive a grade no higher than "Beta" because it
relies on a
snapshot of the as-yet unreleased Standalone Tiles package.
+1 to the above.
Greg
