Just a suggestion. It would be helpful, to me at least, if you were to include within the release notes one or more snapshot version numbers of standalone Tiles, one or more version numbers of Spring and one or more version numbers of other targeted components that work with Shale with which you the development group believes v1.0.4 appears to work. I realize that items like Tiles in sandboxes are fast moving targets, but it helps us users avoid having to do a lot of trial and error just to find a single combination of components that works. If we have one working set, substituting different components one at a time using trial and error during component upgrades is far less burdensome that not knowing anything about what works together.
-=> Gregg <=-
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 12/29/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > From: "Rahul Akolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Date: Thu, December 28, 2006 4:56 pm
>> > > To: commits@shale.apache.org
>> > >
>> > > The above "projected quality" paragraph needs to be updated to
>> reflect
>> > > the current sentiment. Of the two items in that list, 1.0.4 will
>> > > address most of the dialog issues (so I've removed that).
>> > >
>> > > Someone more familiar with shale-tiles (and changes implied by going
>> > > TLP) should update the above paragraph in the release notes. TIA.
>>
>>
>>
>> The TLP hasn't changed the status of Tiles just yet. Tiles will
>> still be a
>> snapshot for a while because it will take some time to get the TLP
>> infrastructure set up.
>>
> <snip/>
>
> Thanks, the related bits are in section 1 and 4 of the release notes
> -- you're welcome (as is everyone else) to tweak the wording (long,
> possibly fragmented URL):
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shale/framework/trunk/src/site/resources/docs/release-notes-1.0.4.html
>
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
