I am pretty fine with a 1.0.5 instead of 1.0.4.1 ;) -M
On 1/23/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that contains the bug I fixed, > are we providing a 104_1 ? > <snip/> Nope, those are the bits we voted on for 1.0.4. I think you are asking about SHALE-394, that will be available in subsequent releases (next in 1_0_X line is 1.0.5 ATM). We should discuss whether having bugfix releases for individual modules makes sense (so having a shale-view 1.0.4.1, rather than a framework 1.0.5 in this case). -Rahul > .M >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
