Hi all, I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project. So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not move, but just stay in Shale. Also let's see where templating and component development goes before making a decision about Clay. So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2 all Add-Ons move to MyFaces.
Bernhard > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag > von Craig > McClanahan > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48 > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > > > > > * Remoting > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too. > > > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0. > > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access, > particularly for resources provided in a jar file instead of as > exploded files in a WAR. Until JSF 2 comes along, that's pretty > useful all by itself. > > > Craig >
