On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Paul Lindner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kam Kasravi <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Will this framework be taking advantage of the features framework where > > views would be appropriately expanded, etc? > > > > Not sure.. John? > > > > Also, has there been any effort to expand gadgets.rpc so that gadget <-> > > gadget or gadget broadcast would allow gadgets > > to communicate with one another? > > > > There's been some work integrating Shindig with OpenAjax. That still > relies > upon a hub system. I've been experimenting with pubsub, and it seems to > work pretty well too. > > > > > Finally is the new js taking advantage of SES or commonjs to load > > resources? > > > > > > Can you give us a reference to SES? I'm not aware of what that is. > > SES (See http://code.google.com/p/es-lab/wiki/SecureEcmaScript and more generally http://code.google.com/p/es-lab) is a securable subset of ES5. It borrows features from the different securable javascript subsets and is compatible with Caja. By targeting ES5 strict, it is possible to provide the same kind of controlled sharing and isolation that Caja provides without the heavy rewriting. SES is larger subset of javascript than Cajita, Valija or AdSafe and since requires only verification or light rewriting of array expressions, SES runs at full speed in browsers that support ES5 strict. commonjs looks interesting. It's modules concept aligns pretty well with > what we do with the js features and would be a more portable way of > annotating dependencies compared to say closure-library. >
