Well if it won't be documented somewhere it probably won't be used... but I see your point, not in spec, so it won't be cleared when it is available.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, John Hjelmstad <[email protected]> wrote: > Regrettably the utiltest.js harness still is pretty spare. Re: adding the > API, I'm a little hesitant since this isn't part of the spec... at the same > time, it accommodates a common use case. > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> lgtm, (Do we have any tests for this?) >> The new function is part of the "api", so it probably should be added to >> Shindig documentation of how to use it. >> >> >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/1760044/show >> > >
