Thanks Paul.

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Paul Lindner <[email protected]>wrote:

> Adding Scott Seely, who proposed the original spec and may know of how
> MySpace implemented content upload.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Gabriel Guardincerri <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Please, I need some help with this, I just need to know if I'm on the
> right
> > track
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gabriel
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Gabriel Guardincerri <
> [email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I have another questions, is about the file's metada, I think that from
> > the
> > > spec, there's no need to store any metada of the file. That should be
> > > handled by some other entity, in most cases MediaItem. The only problem
> > that
> > > I see with that is how does Shindig know that should delete the file
> when
> > > the MediaItem entity is deleted. Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gabriel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Gabriel Guardincerri <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm implementing Content Upload<
> >
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/1.0/Core-API-Server.xml#Content-Upload
> >spec
> > and I have a few question to be sure that I'm understanding it
> > >> correctly:
> > >>
> > >> I wrote an extend exaplantion in a post with title "Uploading and
> > storing
> > >> files data", but it can be summarized in that Uploaded Content is a
> > param
> > >> for some other action. I mean, if we want to create an Activity that
> > >> contains an image, the we call the create activity service with the
> > usual
> > >> params of the activity and also with a file as a param. Uploading a
> file
> > >> param is not easy, so this spec is about how to handle that.
> > >>
> > >> If that interpretation is right, then uploading content is an
> extension
> > on
> > >> what type of params can be used to create/update any entity. Therefore
> > we
> > >> need a general way to handle files that could be used by potentially
> any
> > >> service.
> > >>
> > >> So, I'm right now trying to implement the RPC part of the spec, since
> it
> > >> can be used from the browser and all the multipart-form handling code
> is
> > >> already there in Shindig.
> > >>
> > >> Just to start with something I've modified AppDataHandler to handle
> > binary
> > >> files (I know that the spec says that App Data only handles Strings
> > values,
> > >> but I need something like for myself, I'll port this to meet the
> spec).
> > So
> > >> now the AppDataHandler.create(...) method is able to handle files if
> > they
> > >> are in the SocialRequestItem. It saves the file using a new
> > >> service ContentUploadService. Then replace the key that is mapped to
> > that
> > >> file, e.g:
> > >>
> > >> If the there is a values map with:
> > >>
> > >> "data" : {
> > >>    "image":"@field:image1"
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> Then it searches for a FormMimePart with name "image1", saves the
> > content
> > >> to a new file, gets this file's ID and changes that value with it:
> > >>
> > >> "data" : {
> > >>    "image":"<fileID>"
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> Then continues as before.
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure if that's the best place, I mean that Handles handle the
> > file
> > >> storage and then resolving the reference to the file. The good side of
> > this
> > >> is that each handler would be able to decide what to do with file
> > params.
> > >> The bad side is that it could be resolved when the raw content of the
> > >> request is being converted, so it would be transparent to handlers.
> Any
> > >> suggestion on this?
> > >>
> > >> Another thing is that I'm not sure about how to get that file, I mean
> to
> > >> see it in the browser, AFAIU the file ID could be actually an URL that
> > can
> > >> be used to get the file. Is this right?
> > >>
> > >> So WDYT? I'm on the right way?
> > >>
> > >> BTW, I'm attaching a patch with the changes.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Gabriel
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>

Reply via email to