Hi Mat You could post a snippet of the html which has the scheme-less link, the iframe you are talking about and the culprit <base tag> in gadget html. That should help dev@ community understand the problem better. Also, you might want to take a look at AbsolutePathReferenceRewriter<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/rewrite/AbsolutePathReferenceVisitor.java>. It expands all the relative urls relative to the base tag provided in the html. It doesnt have iframe-src for now, but i guess it can be added and might solve the problem your seeing.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Mat Mannion <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I understand the thinking behind scheme-less proxy/concat URIs, but I > don't think they're working as intended. The problem is that the > intention is that they should be on the same scheme as the iframe > renderer, but we then insert a <base> tag with the gadget URI, which > means that the URIs for /proxy and /concat are actually on the same > scheme as the gadget - this is causing issues for us as we don't run > the shindig server on HTTP at all. At least, this is the behaviour I'm > seeing in Google Chrome. > > Could someone take a look at this and tell me if I'm right in my > deduction that this is what's causing the problem? > > Thanks in advance, > > Mat > > -- > Mat Mannion > Web Developer > IT Services > University of Warwick > Coventry > CV4 7AL > > Tel: 024 765 74433 > Email: [email protected] >
