Awesome, I was just looking at container.js and wondering what was
locked-domain. Thanks for the fast response.

Gabriel

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:40 PM, John Hjelmstad <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gabriel:
>
> This is precisely what the "locked-domain" feature does.
>
> The default implementation in Shindig - which Google uses - is to generate
> a
> URL w/ prefix base32(sha1(gadgetUrl)).
>
> This occurs when:
> A) the gadget requires "locked-domain" explicitly
> B) the gadget requires another feature that has a <dependency> on
> locked-domain
> C) the container is set up (in its ContainerConfig, via key
> "gadgets.uri.iframe.lockedDomainRequired" with type boolean) to demand
> locked-domain for all renders
>
> The validation algorithm is thus:
> A. when a gadget requires locked-domain, it MUST have a locked-domain
> prefix.
> B. if the domain on which a gadget is rendered has *any* valid
> locked-domain
> *suffix*, mark as invalid.
>
> Doing this ensures the domain isolation of each gadget.
>
> The bulk of this functionality is implemented in the Java implementation
> in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/DefaultIframeUriManager.java
>
> INVALID_DOMAIN is returned in the mismatched cases. locked-domain URLs are
> generated if (usingLockedDomain(...)).
>
> The default prefix generator is:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/uri/HashShaLockedDomainPrefixGenerator.java
>
> --j
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Gabriel Guardincerri <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We would like increase the security of each gadget by having each one in
> a
> > different subdomain. This is, have each iframe in a different subdomain
> to
> > use the cross-domain security of the browsers.
> > We found that we can define the urls using our own container.js, but
> > there's
> > no way to assign a different subdomain for each gadget. So, is there a
> way
> > to make that more dynamic, or to do something else to have a different
> > subdomain for each gadget?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gabriel
> >
>

Reply via email to