Can you suggest how the json-rpc response should be different based on the
spec?
I think the example shows "entry:" instead of "list" is that what's
confusing?
[{"id":"viewer","result":{"gender":"male","id":"john.doe","name":{"formatted":"John
Doe","familyName":"Doe","givenName":"John"}}},
{"id":"viewerFriends",
"result":{"filtered":false,"totalResults":3,"sorted":false,
"list":[{"gender":"male","id":"george.doe","name":{"formatted":"George
Doe","familyName":"Doe","givenName":"George"}},
{"gender":"female","id":"jane.doe","name":{"formatted":"Jane
Doe","familyName":"Doe","givenName":"Jane"}},
{"gender":"female","id":"maija.m","name":{"formatted":"Maija
Meikäläinen","familyName":"Meikäläinen","givenName":"Maija"}}],
"updatedSince":false}},
{"id":"viewerData","result":{"john.doe":{"count":"0"}}},
{"id":"viewerFriendData","result":{"jane.doe":{"count":"7"},"maija.m":{},"george.doe":{"count":"2"}}}]
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:23 AM, franck tankoua <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Can someone help me on this please.
> I have looked at org.apache.shindig.protocol.JsonRpcServlet at the
> specification is still for 0.9.
> While reading the release note of the version 2.0.0 I have thought there
> were an implementation for this.
>
> If there is nothing, I could try to work on a patch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, franck tankoua <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All.
> >
> > Any work being done to follow up the specification 1.0 ?
> >
> >
> >
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/1.0/Core-Data.xml#Collection
> >
> >
> > --
> > Franck
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Franck
>
--
Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
