Hi Henry, We aren't sure and that is why we need a little time to ensure we can maintain consistency with our current JSR 330 implementation that ships in our Java certified products today
From: Henry Saputra <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 03/11/2011 04:49 PM Subject: Re: guice 3.0-rc3 Hi Han, Could you explain more on how would this impact interoperability with your internal JSR330 implementation? - Henry On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Han Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > -1... with recommendation that we put this vote on hold and revisit in > about 2 weeks to allow our team to validate interoperability and ensure > that we can maintain consistency with our internal current jsr 330 > implementation that we ship with products today. > > > > > From: Paul Lindner <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 03/10/2011 11:49 AM > Subject: guice 3.0-rc3 > > > > Guice 3.0 is very close to release. To help us prepare for this I would > propose that we upgrade to this version in trunk. There are a number of > reasons why 3.0 is preferred including better OSGi support and jsr330 > support that should make integrating easier. More details are here: > > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30 > > If no one objects I'll commit the pom changes late this week. > > -- > Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner > > -- Thanks, Henry
