snapshot

http://codereview.appspot.com/4303043/diff/1/features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js
File features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/4303043/diff/1/features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js#newcode65
features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js:65:
___.markFunc(schema[0][schema[1]], schema[1]);
On 2011/03/22 17:49:54, ihab.awad wrote:
Use markTameAsFunction() not markFunc(). Throughout. But ok as-is
given your
clarification that these are not yet being used and will be replaced
wholesale
asap in favor of a caja.js-based solution.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4303043/diff/1/features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js#newcode100
features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js:100: imports.window
= imports.window || {};
On 2011/03/23 01:52:35, johnfargo wrote:
all this JS will soon be subjected to Closure's property obfuscation.
I assume
the key names here are important/should not be obfuscated. True? If
so, I'd
recommend ['window'] et al.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4303043/diff/1/features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js#newcode105
features/src/main/javascript/features/caja/taming.js:105: imports =
imports.window;
On 2011/03/22 07:48:24, felix8a wrote:
it wasn't immediately obvious to me why imports and window are
constructed in
this weird way.  but all this is going to be replaced soon-ish anyway,
right?

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4303043/

Reply via email to