http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30
Any news on this front? This new Guice now requires the javax.inject jar, which originates from http://code.google.com/p/atinject/ and uses the Apache 2.0 license. [INFO] +- com.google.inject:guice:jar:3.0:compile [INFO] | +- javax.inject:javax.inject:jar:1:compile [INFO] | \- aopalliance:aopalliance:jar:1.0:compile On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Han Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Henry, > We aren't sure and that is why we need a little time to ensure we can > maintain consistency with our current JSR 330 implementation that ships in > our Java certified products today > > > > From: Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 03/11/2011 04:49 PM > Subject: Re: guice 3.0-rc3 > > > > Hi Han, > > Could you explain more on how would this impact interoperability with > your internal JSR330 implementation? > > - Henry > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Han Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1... with recommendation that we put this vote on hold and revisit in > > about 2 weeks to allow our team to validate interoperability and ensure > > that we can maintain consistency with our internal current jsr 330 > > implementation that we ship with products today. > > > > > > > > > > From: Paul Lindner <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Date: 03/10/2011 11:49 AM > > Subject: guice 3.0-rc3 > > > > > > > > Guice 3.0 is very close to release. To help us prepare for this I would > > propose that we upgrade to this version in trunk. There are a number of > > reasons why 3.0 is preferred including better OSGi support and jsr330 > > support that should make integrating easier. More details are here: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30 > > > > If no one objects I'll commit the pom changes late this week. > > > > -- > > Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Henry > > -- Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
