I don't think the gadget url is null, rather, this test is overriding the 
LockedDomainPrefixGenerator to always produce "LOCKED".

I find it interesting to see that these tests assert that the scheme is 
"".  Why is that?  Shouldn't the renderingUri returned by makeRenderingUri 
have a scheme, as it does in the non-locked domain case.

These tests would also hit the exception if the locked domain suffix were 
set to have a port number.  A simple way to reproduce the issue I'm seeing 
is set LD_SUFFIX in DefaultIframeUriManagerTest to be 
".lockeddomain.com:8080".

Best regards,
-Stanton



From:   Ryan J Baxter/Westford/IBM@Lotus
To:     [email protected], 
Cc:     Ziv Horesh <[email protected]>
Date:   03/31/2011 21:48
Subject:        Re: DefaultIframeUriManager for locked domains



So I just ran the unit tests in DefaultIframeUriManagerTest,java and this 
code does get hit.  ldAddedForcedAlways seems to touch that code.  This 
test produces LOCKED.lockeddomain.com as a domain and Uri.parse does not 
blow up on that.  However I did notice that the gadget url in the test is 
null, so I am not sure if this test is valid since you can't create a hash 

of that.  Stanton, we probably want to take a deeper look at this test.

-Ryan

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile



From:   John Hjelmstad <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected], 
Cc:     Ziv Horesh <[email protected]>
Date:   03/31/2011 09:06 PM
Subject:        Re: DefaultIframeUriManager for locked domains



Not when we run tests in Shindig... unless somehow that code path is never
hit.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ziv Horesh <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:18 PM, John Hjelmstad <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>
> > Hi Stanton,
> >
> > Odd, this has worked for us for quite some time. Uri.parse(...) just
> > doesn't
> > throw a UriException. Are you overriding UriParser?
> >
> But we are overriding the parser...
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Stanton Sievers <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Has anyone been able to use the DefaultIframeUriManager when locked
> > > domains are configured?  I've configured
> > > gadgets.uri.iframe.lockedDomainSuffix in my container.js and have 
set
> > > shindig.locked-domain.enabled=true in shindig.properties.  I seem to 

be
> > > hitting the correct code paths, but I think the logic in
> > > DefaultIframeUriManager.makeRenderingUri() is incorrect.
> > >
> > > In the case where locked domains are enabled we do a string
> concatenation
> > > of the generated locked domain prefix and the configured
> > > gadgets.uri.iframe.lockedDomainSuffix in order to build the host 
name.
> > The
> > > problem is that immediately after that we try to do Uri.parse() on 
the
> > > host name which is throwing a UriException because we don't have a
> > > protocol/schema for the url, i.e., the url is just <gadget url
> > > hash>.mydomain.com instead of http://<gadget url hash>.mydomain.com.
> > >
> > > Does this just not work for the DefaultIframeUriManager and those 
who
> > want
> > > locked domains need to bind to their own UriModule?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Stanton
> > >
> > >
> >
>






Reply via email to