Cool, thx.

Committed as rev 1147015.

- Henry

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Ryan J Baxter <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to the caching.  I don't have a problem with it.
>
> -Ryan
>
> Email: [email protected]
> Phone: 978-899-3041
> developerWorks Profile
>
>
>
> From:   Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> To:     [email protected],
> Date:   07/13/2011 10:17 PM
> Subject:        Re: Setting
> shindig.gadget-rewrite.externalize-feature-libs=true in shindig.properties
> by default
>
>
>
> Forgot to put link for the performance claim:
> http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#external
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> One advantage is that the javascript could be cached so different
>> gadgets having the same features should not require request to server
>> to get it again.
>>
>> Second, Fargo or Michael could correct me on this, the JS serving path
>> via JsServlet allow JS compiler via closure and JS processor flow to
>> process the javascript code to be more efficient. I dont think the
>> inline script will go through the same path.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Ryan J Baxter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>> So what's the benefit of doing this?  Just trying to understand why
> this
>>> would be better.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Phone: 978-899-3041
>>> developerWorks Profile
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:   Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
>>> To:     [email protected],
>>> Date:   07/12/2011 11:11 PM
>>> Subject:        Re: Setting
>>> shindig.gadget-rewrite.externalize-feature-libs=true in
> shindig.properties
>>> by default
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> Yes, there will be script tag with src attribute that points to
>>> JsServlet for the gadget features.
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Ryan J Baxter <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Henry, as a result of your proposed change would we put a script tag
>>> with
>>>> a src attribute in it as opposed to putting the javascript inline in
> the
>>>> gadget?
>>>>
>>>> -Ryan
>>>>
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>> Phone: 978-899-3041
>>>> developerWorks Profile
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From:   Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
>>>> To:     [email protected],
>>>> Date:   07/12/2011 06:26 PM
>>>> Subject:        Setting
>>>> shindig.gadget-rewrite.externalize-feature-libs=true in
>>> shindig.properties
>>>> by default
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HI All,
>>>>
>>>> If there is no objection I would like to set
>>>> shindig.gadget-rewrite.externalize-feature-libs in shindig.properties
>>>> to true.
>>>>
>>>> Its currently set to false which I think because some issue with JS
>>>> handler code.
>>>>
>>>> With a lot of changes to the JavaScript serving code, setting the
>>>> shindig.gadget-rewrite.externalize-feature-libs to true will help run
>>>> the code not only for container but also for gadget features.
>>>>
>>>> - Henry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to