+1. Presumably you won't be hooking up gadgets.setLogLevel for rpc'ing. Since gadgets.log does not return a value, hooking it up to something that has async semantics doesn't seem problematic to me.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Ryan J Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > Today the gadgets.log API essentially logs to the windows console. The > problem is there is no way to "hook into" gadgets.log to log the > information elsewhere. There are some application that have other > existing logging mechanisms, or where the console is not available. Would > anyone by opposed to adding an rpc call to gadgets.log so applications can > register there own handlers and log the information using other means if > they want? > > -Ryan > > Email: [email protected] > Phone: 978-899-3041 > developerWorks Profile > >
