Thanks! Will commit after yours :)

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michael Hermanto <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1237/#review1271
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ship it!
>
>
> ... upon fix.
>
> - Michael
>
>
> On 2011-08-02 00:57:26, johnfargo wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/1237/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated 2011-08-02 00:57:26)
> >
> >
> > Review request for shindig and Michael Hermanto.
> >
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > The previous model of using exportJs() for both deferred and actual
> symbol exports turned out to be faulty due to the fact that top-level/global
> arguments are not properties. As well, splitting export() and defer() makes
> the relevant functionality more compact where actually used, and more
> explicit.
> >
> > This CL reverts the exportJs() changes that bind deferred symbols, though
> keeps the deferred method execution intact.
> >
> > It splits out deferred symbol binding into a new method, deferJs(), while
> doing so. The two methods work in concert with one another, communicating
> through ___jsl.dm.
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/deferjs/deferjs.js
> PRE-CREATION
> >   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/deferjs/feature.xml
> PRE-CREATION
> >   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/exportjs/exportjs.js
> 1152380
> >   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/features.txt 1152380
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1237/diff
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> > CL sent for early review. Doing more testing now in real-world scenarios.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > johnfargo
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to