This was to generate a gadgetContext to validate the request by when locked domains are enabled. It does not use this url to fetch a result. Are you making the makeRequest call from the container (We've seen something similar)?
A work-around for you would be to try and use osapi.http.* methods as these are preferred over makeRequest at the moment anyway. If so, please file a JIRA for the issue at issues.apache.org and assign it to me. From: Paul Lindner <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Ryan Baxter <[email protected]>, Date: 02/01/2012 06:29 AM Subject: Re: REQ: Shindig 3.0.0, makeRequest not processed correctly This was introduced in: ommit 9d96fd6462d3ab6f039e99853119e4067cfeeb3d Author: Ryan Baxter <[email protected]> Date: Mon Oct 3 20:35:14 2011 +0000 SHINDIG-1628 Committed For Dan Dumont Locked domain cleanup and shared-domain-locking feature On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Support CarbookPlus <[email protected] > wrote: > The class MakeRequestHandler#fetch pass in an own/anonymous implementation > of HttpGadgetContext. This not take the URL of variable 'url' it takes the > 'gadgetURL' which (of course) is 'undefined'. > > Snippet from your code: > GadgetContext context = new HttpGadgetContext(request) { > public Uri getUrl() { > return gadgetUri; <----- HERE > } > > public boolean getIgnoreCache() { > return getParameter("bypassSpecCache").equals("1"); > } > }; > > > Could it be an failure/issue of the shindig code? > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "Support CarbookPlus" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2012 10:21:25 > Betreff: REQ: Shindig 3.0.0, makeRequest not processed correctly > > > Hello, > > we are trying to integrate the shindig 3.0.0 (-SNAPSHOT). Some basic > gadgets working fine, but if one of our gadgets is calling makeRequest we > never get any result. While debugging the MakeRequestServlet > (~ProxyServlet) our call cause an exception in "Processor#process". The > return message is " Url undefined does not include scheme". We don't know > if it depends on a missing "gadget"-URL parameter (value)? > > Can anyone help us? > > Thanks > > > > > > -- Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- profiles.google.com/pmlindner
