-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4486/#review6431
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for working on this!

- Dan


On 2012-03-27 16:09:19, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4486/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-27 16:09:19)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig and Dan Dumont.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> As part of continuing refactoring of the site and holder code, this is 
> another cleanup to simplify the close flow:
> 1. Move the responsibility of delete first element of the gadget HTML element 
> wrapper to site_holder
> 2. The GadgetSite.getActiveSiteHolder now check for currentGadgetHolder_ then 
> loadingGadgetHolder_ because its a public API that should modify currently 
> active holder.
> 3. osapi.container.SiteHolder.prototype.dispose now responsible  to remove 
> child element.
> 4. osapi.container.GadgetHolder.prototype.dispose and 
> osapi.container.UrlHolder.prototype.dispose need to call parent function 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/container.site.gadget/gadget_holder.js
>  1305481 
>   
> trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/container.site.gadget/gadget_site.js
>  1305481 
>   
> trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/container.site.url/url_holder.js 
> 1305481 
>   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/container.site/site.js 1305481 
>   trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/container.site/site_holder.js 
> 1305481 
>   trunk/features/src/test/javascript/features/container.url/url_site_test.js 
> 1305481 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4486/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Modify the jsunit and pass the unit tests. Run it through common container 
> test page.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>

Reply via email to