Does that mean it can happen at the regularly scheduled time, i.e., the end of the month? Or do you think we need beta5 ASAP because of the caja fix?
Thanks, -Stanton On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>wrote: > Ah you are right Ryan, looks like you had cutoff the beta4 before > Dan's commit the changes. > > We have "custom" beta4 that include Dan's refactor that we now revert > to default beta4. > > So looks like we only need beta5 for Caja fix then I suppose. > > - Henry > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hmm so looks like the original bug > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1864 is close with wrong > > fix version then? > > > > It has fix version of 2.5.0-beta4 > > > > - Henry > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am fairly sure Dan's oAuth changes didn't make it in beta 4 but the > Caja > >> fix probably warrants a new build. > >> > >> -Ryan > >> > >> On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Paul Lindner <lind...@inuus.com> wrote: > >> > >> sure. happy to. > >> > >> > >> On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Henry Saputra wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Ryan or Paul, > >>> > >>> With Dan's reverting changes to improvement for oauthpopup (this will > >>> fix OAuth 1.0a flow for three legged dance) and Paul changes to fix > >>> Caja security vulnerability, could one of you help preparing > >>> 2.5.0-beta5 release? > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> - Henry > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Paul Lindner -- lind...@inuus.com -- profiles.google.com/pmlindner >
