My guess would be that maybe that is because it is in shindig-extras and
not part of the main features project, although I am just guessing.  At the
end of the day they all get loaded into the same registry I believe so I
don't see why this would matter.

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christian Fischer <flyinghu...@web.de>wrote:

>
>  There's also a property in shindig.properties that lists the core features
>> everything must have (which is currently core and rpc)
>>
> Hi, thanks for the answers - sorry for the delayed reply, but i'm very
> busy at the moment.
>
> Enabling the features with shindig.proterties works fine for my custom
> feature :)
>
> but i also must enable the pubsub-2 feature for all gadgets.
> For an unknow reason for me, this doesn't work.
> I included the pubsub-2 feature in shindig.properties and also as a
> dependency of my custom feature.
> -> Why isn't there any gadgets.Hub available?
> Is this not possible with the dependency or shindig.properties Methods?
>
> Thanks a lot and nice Weekend,
>
> Christian
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>*
>> *wrote:
>>
>>  HI Christian,
>>>
>>> You can either have custom DefaultGadgetSpecFactory.**parse() and
>>> decorate the ModulePrefs element with your features or have custom
>>> Processor.process() to add default or additional feature there.
>>>
>>> Or you can have custom rewriter early in the flow and add the required
>>> features via call to Gadget.addFeature before other rewriters process
>>> the gadget
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Christian Fischer <flyinghu...@web.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> i'm using shindig (inside Apache RAVE) for my master-thesis and need to
>>>> enable a default feature for all gadgets even the gadgets doesn't
>>>> require
>>>> this feature.
>>>> In other words: i must inject a reference to a javascript file into each
>>>> gadget.
>>>>
>>>> What is the best way to acquire this goal with shindig?
>>>> It is possible to set a feature as "required for all"? Then i only must
>>>> create a new feature.
>>>> If not, which source files are responsible for the <script ...>
>>>>
>>> inclusion?
>>>
>>>> For now, the Code looks a bit confusing to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to