-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/13/12 12:30 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> As for your question, I think I am kind of loss on what your
> concerns are?
> 
> Could you give a bit more example of what conflict or confusion
> about matching the fields for the Person data type with the spec?

For example, taken the following fields:

- - "accounts": the spec defines this field as PluralField<Account>.
  Shindig implements this as List<Account>, with no possibility to
  specify the primary account;
- - "addresses": also a PluralField<Address>, which is implemented in
  Shindig as List<Address>, while the Address object has a field
  primary;
- - "emails": PluralField<Email>, implemented as a List<ListField> in
  Shindig.

So it appears there are three ways of defining a PluralField in
Shindig (actually two: the first item is a bug IMO). Which one should
be used for adding new PluralFields?

In addition: there are several fields in Person implemented as
enumeration of fixed values, while the spec doesn't mention anything
on these value constraints (e.g. "drinker"). Shouldn't these fields be
made less restricted?

- -- 
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards

Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814

/My world is:/

Luminis Technologies B.V.
IJsselburcht 3
6825 BS  Arnhem
+31 88 586 46 30

http://www.luminis-technologies.com
http://www.luminis.eu

KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=X7yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to