I'm all for it. I think the Shindig community can work in a review capacity at least.
Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos. On Jun 10, 2014 7:46 AM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > That is unfortunate. As I am sure you are aware we usually do things > via consensus and would take a vote on something like this. It is > very rare (in my observation) that one person speaks for the entire > community. I assume everyone will back it, but still it is better to > do things the "right way". I will wait until tonight until making any > decision to give everyone else the change to way in. > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 10/06/14 02:13, Ryan Baxter wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for reaching out Andy. Is there any way we can get an > >> extension on the deadline? I would like to put this out for a vote to > >> the Shindig community but we usually give everyone 3 days to review > >> and vote. Since there is a very short runway on this I am not sure > >> everyone will have time to review. > >> > > > > Not really - it's determined by W3C and because they have announced a > > deadline they will be keen to stick to it. > > > > This is just a request for support - it does not actually commit the > project > > to do anything specific. > > > > If you are implementing a spec, or a part of a spec, then not ticking the > > first 3 "intends" would be routine. > > > > You can include a brief (one sentence-ish) advertising for your work. > > > > Andy > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi there, > >>> > >>> W3C are looking for support in creating an Open Social WG. > >>> > >>> ASF is a member of W3C and can express such support (I'm the W3C AC rep > >>> for > >>> Apache - I push web buttons). > >>> > >>> I've had a request from Harry Halpin to add support - if this projects > >>> wants > >>> me to go ahead and express support, please let me know - the deadline > is > >>> 23:59, Boston time on 2014-06-10. > >>> > >>> the question are below: > >>> > >>> Activity: > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-activity-proposal.html > >>> Working Group: > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html > >>> Interst Group: > >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-ig-charter.html > >>> > >>> The survey covers: > >>> > >>> Q1::Support for the Proposal > >>> > >>> (choose one - can add a comment): > >>> > >>> My organization: > >>> * supports this Activity Proposal as is. > >>> > >>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, but supports the proposal > >>> whether or not the changes are adopted (your details below). > >>> > >>> * suggests changes to this Activity Proposal, and only supports the > >>> proposal > >>> if the changes are adopted [Formal Objection] (your details below). > >>> > >>> * opposes this Activity Proposal and requests that this group be closed > >>> [Formal Objection] (your details below). > >>> * abstains from this review. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Q2:: Support for Deliverables of the group > >>> (choose any that apply - can add a comment) > >>> > >>> My organization: > >>> * intends to review drafts as they are published and send comments. > >>> * intends to develop experimental implementations and send experience > >>> reports (your details below). > >>> * intends to develop products based on this work (your details below). > >>> * intends to apply this technology in our operations. > >>> * would be interested in participating in any press activity connected > >>> with > >>> this group. > >>> > >>> Andy > >>> VP W3C Relations. > >>> > > >
