great! submitted.

On Mon Aug 18 2014 at 4:16:56 AM Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> -Ryan
>
> > On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I don't see a reason to still support maven 2.
> >
> > Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
> >> On Aug 18, 2014 6:26 AM, "Andreas Kohn" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> from my point of view: would there be any reason to stick with Maven 2?
> >> Maven 3 seems to be "stable" since quite a while.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Paul Lindner <lind...@inuus.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Would people be willing to make maven 3.0.4 a requirement for building?
> >> I
> >>> could then update to the latest yuicompressor.
> >>
>

Reply via email to