On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > Ok, but why did Alan (who wrote the code) recommend that it stay out > of this release? If it's not due to licensing issues, then it's > probably because it may not have been decently vetted and that it may > be changed enough later such that we could have likely > backwards-incompatibility issues. > > If this is the reason, then it sounds like a good enough of one to me > to keep it out of the next minor release. > > How hard is it to just tag what we have and delete that module? Do > you have any objections Kalle?
I just wanted to make sure we had consensus on what we do with the Crowd realm before we released it. If it's "commented out" by removing the module entry in the tag then I think the code should be totally removed. IIUC, it's the tag that Apache is releasing and the artifacts are nice things that we do for our community. I recommend that we branch 1.1, remove crowd, and make any tags we want off of that. Regards, Alan
