On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jared Bunting <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the changes made to ModularRealmAuthorizer, it appears that now, > if I wish to implement a Realm that provides Authorization, I am required to > extend AuthorizingRealm? This seems a bit short-sighted. I'm not > particularly crazy about the inherent change in what "Realm" means, but > wouldn't it at least make more sense for ModularRealmAuthorizer to check if > the realm is an instance of Authorizer?
Duh. Of course, thanks, give a me a second. Kalle
