Sure, I agree with this mostly. I thought of a 1.1.1 because I don't really know how close to 1.2 we are - the exception translation stuff has still has to be finished (I'm working on this now - not too difficult), and the OpenId stuff should be wrapped up soon enough. I'd also like to increase the tests for a 1.2 release, but that's just my hope. So if that work takes another month or so, I think it might be good to get the bug fixes out now. Better to release those earlier than later I'd say...
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Nobody's specifically asked for 1.1.1 but if you need it, I don't see > why not. The only objection I can think of is that we could just as > well focus on getting 1.2 out (not that far out necessarily) if we > care about driving usage to the latest version - it does matter in > which order you release, which versions you direct users toward and > what the roadmap is. > > Kalle > > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> We've had enough bug fixes corrected recently that I think it >> justifies a 1.1.1 point release. Any objections? If not, I'll merge >> the fixes into the branch and then get ready to call a vote. >> >> Les
