Hi Jared, I've not done that before - do you have an example or patch that shows how it would work?
Cheers, Les On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Jared Bunting <[email protected]> wrote: > What about reimplementing it as a Junit rule? There are often other > lifecycle bits that I want to incorporate in a unit test and having it > implemented as an abstract class seems to make this difficult. > > On Nov 22, 2011 5:54 PM, "Les Hazlewood" <[email protected]> wrote: > > While I agree that it is easy to copy-n-paste, I do believe it is > easier and more convenient to just depend on a test jar, subclass the > test class and be on your way writing tests. > > Given the two options, my vote is to create a separate 'test' module > that people can depend on if they want. People can depend on it if > they like, but they can just ignore it if they'd rather copy-n-paste. > > My .02, > > Les > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Allan Ditzel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The main value woul...
