This vote thread has been closed due to a re-release. New vote thread to follow immediately.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > I renamed it instead of deleting, just in case. > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> Correction, it will affect our existing tag - I have to delete it so >> the re-release can use that same name. >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >>> (P.S. I'll be doing this from the 1.2.x branch, so it won't affect >>> trunk or our existing tag and shouldn't conflict/interrupt anyone) >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> This seems to be devolving instead of improving. >>>> >>>> I'm going to just delete the openid4j module entirely (it is in the >>>> trunk, we won't 'lose' it), re-run the full release, use the >>>> 'shiro-root-1.2.0' tag name and start a new VOTE thread. >>>> >>>> If there are any objections, we don't have to start a VOTE, but it >>>> seems as if this will make everyone happy and it seems to be the >>>> fastest option available. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> I'm looking at >>>>> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.2.0/pom.xml >>>>> right now. Here is its <scm> section: >>>>> >>>>> <scm> >>>>> <connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/1.2.0</connection> >>>>> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/1.2.0</developerConnection> >>>>> <url>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/1.2.0</url> >>>>> </scm> >>>>> >>>>> This does not match the current tag url. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Kalle Korhonen >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Jared Bunting >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> The svn info in the pom file is incorrect now. Should we update it to >>>>>>> reflect the new tag? >>>>>> >>>>>> Which svn info? >>>>>> >>>>>> From shiro-root-1.2.0.pom: >>>>>> <scm> >>>>>> >>>>>> <connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.2.0</connection> >>>>>> >>>>>> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.2.0</developerConnection> >>>>>> >>>>>> <url>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.2.0</url> >>>>>> </scm> >>>>>> >>>>>> From the shiro-core manifest: >>>>>> >>>>>> SCM-Revision: ${buildNumber} >>>>>> SCM-url: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/1.2.0/shiro-core >>>>>> Bundle-Version: 1.2.0 >>>>>> Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_29 >>>>>> >>>>>> Kalle >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 19, 2012 9:24 PM, "Kalle Korhonen" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In general, if we cannot release any given module by running mvn -B >>>>>>>>> release:prepare release:pe... >>>>>>> I've renamed the existing 1.2.0 tag to >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.2.0/. We can >>>>>>> by all means continue to use the same voting thread as long as it's >>>>>>> clear what we are voting on. There are no changes to the sources and >>>>>>> the binaries are the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kalle > > > > -- > Les Hazlewood > CTO, Katasoft | http://www.katasoft.com | 888.391.5282 > twitter: @lhazlewood | http://twitter.com/lhazlewood > katasoft blog: http://www.katasoft.com/blogs/lhazlewood > personal blog: http://leshazlewood.com -- Les Hazlewood CTO, Katasoft | http://www.katasoft.com | 888.391.5282 twitter: @lhazlewood | http://twitter.com/lhazlewood katasoft blog: http://www.katasoft.com/blogs/lhazlewood personal blog: http://leshazlewood.com
