Hi,

I'll upgrade the buji-pac4j library to make some tests with the 1.4-RCx
version when it is available.

Thanks.
Best regards,
Jérôme


2016-11-08 18:27 GMT+01:00 Les Hazlewood-2 [via Shiro Developer] <
[email protected]>:

> Sounds good!  Thanks for the summary.
>
> --
> Les
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Brian Demers <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7579569&i=0>> wrote:
>
> > To wrap this up:
> >
> > * Master is now 1.4
> > * openid4j support is now in this PR: #46
> > <https://github.com/apache/shiro/pull/46> (if anyone is interested in
> > picking that up)
> > * faces support was pulled out of master for the time being, and will be
> > managed in this repo: deluan/shiro-faces
> > <https://github.com/deluan/shiro-faces>
> > * The 1.4.x branch was deleted, the previous RC tag remains though:
> > shiro-root-1.4.0-RC1-release-vote1
> > <https://github.com/apache/shiro/tree/shiro-root-1.4.0-RC1-release-vote1>
>
> >
> > Of note, I found and corrected a couple non-backwards compatible items
> > while moving these bits around:
> > * An unused constructor was removed 6eb070f4
> > <https://github.com/apache/shiro/commit/6eb070f4ac6a882eb01ce188701b40
> > d0017ae2d0>
> > * CollectionUtils has a dependency on PrincipalCollection, and was moved
> > back to shiro-core.  This method was marked deprecated, and all usages
> of
> > CollectionUtils in the new modules (lang, cache, etc) have been updated.
> > This class WILL be moved back to lang for 2.0 d44204a4
> > <https://github.com/apache/shiro/commit/d44204a4378f73e17be2e58097ba09
> > d33c1cff3e>
> >
> >
> > I plan on spinning up 1.4 RC2 release tomorrow. If anyone has any
> feedback
> > let me know.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Les Hazlewood <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7579569&i=1>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Cool.  +1 for me in that case :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Les
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Brian Demers <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7579569&i=2>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > To me that would be ideal, but we would end up in a force push/pull
> > > > scenario for anyone tracking the current master.
> > > >
> > > > Though now that you mention it, we could keep the current master.
> > pulling
> > > > out the couple commits I listed above, and just update the versions
> to
> > > > 1.4.  That would simplify/reduce all of those steps.  I'll take
> another
> > > > look and make sure there is nothing that effects the version semver
> > wise,
> > > > but this seems like better path forward.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Les Hazlewood <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7579569&i=3>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm good with #1, but I'm a bit uncomfortable not having a master
> > > branch
> > > > -
> > > > > just because it feels weird to me.  Why not have 1.4.x just be
> > master?
> > > > and
> > > > > delete the 1.4.x branch?
> > > > >
> > > > > In the past, we've typically just created new maj.(currentMin-1).x
> > > > branches
> > > > > if/when we needed them, and maj.(currentMin).x was master.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Les
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Brian Demers <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7579569&i=4>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think everything from master (2.0-alpha) has been merged into
> 1.4
> > > > > except
> > > > > > for a couple things: the biggest of which is breaking up the
> > modules
> > > > into
> > > > > > smaller bits, and the following two commits
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *3a9207fd82eefd867924fcbcdd449bdbe050bb41* Incomplete -
> SHIRO-21:
> > > Add
> > > > > > OpenId as an authentication mechanism - change RelyingPartyRealm
> to
> > > > > extend
> > > > > > AuthenticatingRealm only, openid isn't an authorization protocol
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *8bdf23f5de4d502eae7354319887c05cb38c179b* SHIRO-206: Added
> > initial
> > > > > > implementation based on patch  <<<<< Faces
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The branches were split back in SVN, so dissecting the changes
> > wasn't
> > > > > > trivial.  For the sake of this discussion/vote lets assume this
> is
> > > the
> > > > > > case, (but double check before any work is done)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I propose we:
> > > > > > 1. back port the module splitting to 1.4.
> > > > > >   (this is a semver gray area, but all package names are
> unchanged,
> > > and
> > > > > > Maven dependency's resolution ensures all of the classes are
> > > available
> > > > > the
> > > > > > same way as today)
> > > > > > 2. Remove faces module from master (there is a separate thread
> on
> > the
> > > > on
> > > > > > going support of this, and we can pull it back in at a later
> date)
> > > > > > 3. Move the OpenId commit above to a 'WIP' pull request
> > > > > > 4. Remove the 'master' branch, and change the HEAD ref (default
> > > branch)
> > > > > to
> > > > > > be 1.4.x
> > > > > > 5. Release 1.4
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6+. Create a new 2.0.x branch off of 1.4.x ( Update to JDK 1.8,
> > etc )
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reasons:
> > > > > > * Cherry picking to master is a bit of a pain
> > > > > > * People are grabbing the current master, i think our current
> > default
> > > > > > branch _should_ be what the next minor release branch is.
> > > > > > * Clean history, the old svn commits between the old trunk, and
> > 1.2.x
> > > > > were
> > > > > > did not always use the same commit message, and the git-svn-id
> are
> > > > always
> > > > > > different between the branches.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote is open for lazy consensus
> > > > > > <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>
> for
> > 72
> > > > > hours.
> > > > > > (Personally I'd like to hear thoughts around #1 and #4, as the
> > others
> > > > are
> > > > > > just side effects of doing those actions)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Change-HEAD-to-1-4-x-
> tp7579540p7579569.html
> To start a new topic under Shiro Developer, email
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from Shiro Developer, click here
> <http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=582600&code=bGVsZXVqQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw1ODI2MDB8LTExNzY2MzcxMTY=>
> .
> NAML
> <http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://shiro-developer.582600.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Change-HEAD-to-1-4-x-tp7579540p7579570.html
Sent from the Shiro Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to