Can’t we just remove versions from the OSGi manifests somehow?
Or make it “servlet 2.x or greater”? I would think this would be the easiest 
solution :)

Definitely move to jakarta.* in 3.x timeframe, but that’s long ways off :)

> On Apr 30, 2024, at 1:51 AM, Francois Papon <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I can see only the jakarta dependencies and version stuff for OSGi related to 
> this discussion:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/shiro/issues/1324
> 
> I will try to take a look today but I'm afraid that the best will be to move 
> all to jakarta in the source code and dependencies, or to have a new 
> decidated module.
> 
> We should remove all javax dependencies in the next major version (3.x?).
> 
> Welcome to the javax/jakarta nightmare...
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> 
> On 30/04/2024 03:37, [email protected] wrote:
>> What do we do about outstanding issues though?
>> Some more serious (OSGi?)
>> 
>>> On Apr 29, 2024, at 9:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It sounds good to me.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 8:39 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like we are starting go get multiple issues submitted that are 
>>>> already slated to be fixed in 2.0.1
>>>> I am thinking to release 2.0.1 sooner rather than later.
>>>> 
>>>> However, there are a few outstanding issues: 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/shiro/milestone/7 
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/shiro/milestone/7>
>>>> 
>>>> Can you guys look at those 3 issues and advise?
>>>> Especially https://github.com/apache/shiro/issues/1025 
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/shiro/issues/1025> ?
>>>> I think we can safely move https://github.com/apache/shiro/issues/953 
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/shiro/issues/953> to 2.0.2 or alter.
> 

Reply via email to